MaCover – Why (Single Review)

MaCover are a band from Austria, who pride themselves on their intergenerational make up blending older and newer references between the four band members. As their name suggests, they formed through their interpretative covers from well known and loved Pop-rock classics. Having now gained confidence in writing their own material, ‘Why’ is their second single. It’s nearly 7 minutes in length and offers two movements that capture different feels and identities. If you’re a classic rock/prog-rocker, this is going to hit the spot. If you appreciate that live-band feel presented without too much fuss, this is for you.

There were moments when this track really, really shone. I really enjoyed the guitar solo (on a harmonic Minor scale, I might add!), the vocalists range in the middle breakdown (yes! That NOTE!), and the entire ‘part 2’ of the song. This track is ambitious, and I feel a little more production could have helped embed some of the instruments into the mix at some points. Given its length, consideration in maintaining and growing interest could be increased. The lyrics haven’t grabbed me so much, but the musicianship, harmonies and composition really have.

Composition: this track follows its own rules! However, there are clearly 2 parts to the song, which carry a different feel (first half, more queens of the stone age, second half, more Eagles meets Pink Floyd). The transition between the sections is both a surprise and excellently navigated sonically, particularly by the additional guitar layers.

The production is minimal, with clean well recorded inputs. Hints of more creativity are offered in the middle breakdown with some jagged tremolo on the guitar and distortion on the voice. This works well and offers interest when it is needed for the listener. I really think another few days on production would have made a difference on this track. Tick! Part two has more texture with an acoustic guitar, electric with flange, and more bass movement. Its really nice.

Let’s not be vague: this single couldn’t be performed by any average-joe players: It’s a cut above, with its progressions, timing choices, and harmony spread that requires high technical skill, creativity and confidence.  

The main vocalist has a beautiful, stoic and strong voice, but at times lacks a little confidence on some lines and endings of words. Permission to ramp up the vocal attitude to match that of the guitar is offered. However, I was excited by the middle breakdown where there was great build up, creative production, and an absolute belter of a final note from the vocalist! I think she could do a whole chorus up in that octave- that would elevate the song to another level. I want to hear more of her range- she’s clearly got it, and that’s exciting!

The part 1 chorus is an absolute strength- catchy, opened up by brilliantly mixed backing vocals, catchy lyrics, and percussive interest with all instruments in beautiful syncopation. Tick.

The transition to part 2 of the song was a sudden vortex into Dark Side of the Moon, Pink Floyd. A natural peak in the song for me, my absolute favourite few seconds of listening occurred here. This is due to some panning, additional guitar (flange on electric, acoustic, soaring electric sounds) and again some space created in the mix. A highly effective transition to part 2. More layered sounds like this elsewhere could elevate the whole track.

Final note on part 2: the backing vocals! They are broad (think Eagles vibes), well mixed in, and really bed-in the main female vocalist, which I think really suits her sound. I want so much more of this. I think it’s a USP of theirs. Get those harmonies in there.

In the transition to part 2 of the song (04:37m) , the Pink Floyd feel could have been pushed further, perhaps with an E-bow? Synth etc. At some point, and a tambourine/Hammond organ could have been added, to keep the build-up through the hook repeats.  Its my favourite part, and I expect that of the audience, given this is the catchiest bit. So why not build it even further for their enjoyment?

Part 1 of the track needs a little more sonic spread interest for me: the syncopation is bang on, but after a while, the main riff could have been developed with an octave pedal or more layers on the chord 5^th, bringing more higher tones out and progressing the sound. This song feels like it revolves around the magnetic performance of the guitarist (kudos to him), but I would love an opportunity to hear more oomph from the drums.  Before the guitar solo is a perfect opportunity to close the high-hat and let rip on the kit! The bass gets some flourish in part 2, and this is welcomed. Now the Drums need a turn.

Stronger compression on the vocals might have brought more intimacy to the track and helped with word ending clarity. Sonic range wise, it’s missing a little sizzle and sparkle, which could be bought in with some texture added at small moments.

Rating/Excellent: Overall, this track showcases some amazing live-band talent. I expect they are a very popular band to see play. A really ambitious, impressive second single that stayed as an earworm on second listen. I’m really impressed, if they keep investing in their sound and attitude, it’s going to be top-notch music from them in the future.

Follow MaCover on:
Facebook
Instagram
Website